Prior Authorization Exemption for Buprenorphine Heard in Senate Committee

April 9, 2026

An amended piece of legislation that would exempt buprenorphine from prior authorization (PA) was heard in the Senate Health and Human Services Committee on April 9. 

The MMA has advocated for years to prohibit PA for buprenorphine, arguing that delays in care caused by PA leads to serious adverse health impacts, including death. 

“Much of my day is taking care of patients with opioid use disorder,” testified Kurt DeVine, MD, FASM, on the bill (SF 3822 -Fateh, DFL – Minneapolis). “This problem of prior authorization is not new and the disruption to our office is the smallest part of this problem. The real problem is the delay in getting these medications approved and administered before patients relapse, overdose, or eventually die.” 

Buprenorphine is one of the most common treatments for opioid use disorder. The MMA has argued that timely access to these medications are critical to addressing both the human and economic costs of the opioid epidemic. Insurance barriers such as PA interrupt care at precisely the moment when timely access is most critical. 

The companion to SF 3822 was heard in the House Health Committee earlier this session and laid over for possible inclusion in a future health budget omnibus bill. 

Latest News

Physician/Olympian to Give Inspirational Address at Empowering Physicians Event

August 20, 2026

A physician and Olympian will give an inspirational address as part of this year's Empowering Physicians event on Friday, September 25, at the Minneapolis Institute of Art.

Minnesota Vaccination Rates Trending in Wrong Direction

August 20, 2026

Minnesota received some disturbing news this week from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as data shows that for the 2025-2026 school year, vaccination rates decreased and non-medical exemptions increased.  

Appellate Court Sides with Texas Medical Association in No Suprises Act Lawsuit

August 20, 2026

On August 11, a federal appellate court sided with the Texas Medical Association (TMA) argument that the way the No Surprises Act’s qualifying payment amount (QPA) is calculated has historically favored payers in arbitration.