Revised Minnesota Law: New Maximum Charges for Patient Records Start January 1

December 19, 2024

A new law that sets the maximum charges for patient records becomes effective January 1, 2025. In situations where the law, updated during the 2024 legislative session, applies and there are no other laws, rules, or contracts that provide for lower maximum charges, the new maximum charges will apply.  

Exceptions include when a patient requests a copy of their record for the purpose of reviewing current medical care, no fee can be charged. 

When providing copies of records upon a patient’s request, not for the purpose of reviewing current medical care, the following charges will apply:  

  1. Paper copies: $1 per page, plus $10 for time spent retrieving and copying the records; $10 limit if no records are available; $30 limit for copies of records up to 25 pages; $50 limit for copies of records of up to 100 pages; $50 plus an additional 20 cents per page limit for pages 101 and above; and an overall limit of $500 for any request,  
  2. X-rays: total of $30 for retrieving and reproducing x-rays,  
  3. Electronic copies: total of $20 for retrieving the records. 

A $10 retrieval fee can be charged when records are requested to appeal a denial of social security disability income or benefits only. 

For more information, click here.  

 

Latest News

Physician/Olympian to Give Inspirational Address at Empowering Physicians Event

August 20, 2026

A physician and Olympian will give an inspirational address as part of this year's Empowering Physicians event on Friday, September 25, at the Minneapolis Institute of Art.

Minnesota Vaccination Rates Trending in Wrong Direction

August 20, 2026

Minnesota received some disturbing news this week from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), as data shows that for the 2025-2026 school year, vaccination rates decreased and non-medical exemptions increased.  

Appellate Court Sides with Texas Medical Association in No Suprises Act Lawsuit

August 20, 2026

On August 11, a federal appellate court sided with the Texas Medical Association (TMA) argument that the way the No Surprises Act’s qualifying payment amount (QPA) is calculated has historically favored payers in arbitration.